Personalization of Complementary Feeding in Children With Acute Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a food allergy that results in repetitive vomiting, lethargy, and pallor within 1 to 4 hours of food ingestion. One of the issues in its management is the introduction of new foods. Over the past 25 years, suggestions have been made mainly based on the likelihood that a given food family could induce an episode of acute FPIES. Thus, foods have been categorized into low, moderate, and high risk. The suggestion was always to postpone the introduction of moderate- or high-risk foods, leaving the decision whether to introduce them at home or in hospital to the doctor. These suggestions were designed for all children with acute FPIES, regardless of their geographical area. However, it is true that these suggestions are the result of expert opinion. In recent years, studies have been published that have shown that the risk category of foods varies according to geographical area and so does the prevalence of single FPIES versus multiple FPIES. For this reason, we believe that the introduction of new foods in the child with acute FPIES can and should be tailored according to the geographical area.

Adherence to dietary prescriptions in patients with acute food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-Immunoglobulin (non-IgE)-mediated food allergy. The elimination diet is the only therapy, the culprit food will be reintroduced if tolerance is acquired. However, it is possible that patients do not follow the recommendations given by the healthcare professional. We investigated if our advice to avoid the trigger food in patients with active FPIES and to reintroduce it in the diet in patients who achieved tolerance had been implemented. We interviewed by telephone the parents of children who were diagnosed with acute FPIES. About 23.2% of our patients disregarded our dietary recommendations: 6/42 (14.3%) of patients who passed a tolerance oral food challenge (OFC) did not eat the trigger food, 4/22 (18.2%) of patients who failed OFC ate the trigger food, and 9/18 (50.0%) of patients who did not perform a tolerance OFC ate the trigger food. We have analyzed some possible influencing factors and no difference was found to be statistically significant. Our results are in line with those reported for IgE-mediated food allergies. As has already been proposed by others, we suggest reassessing food consumption in all patients after a food challenge.